Search found 529 matches
- 08 Feb 2016, 21:26
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: Composers vs Editors: A Helpful Addition?
- Replies: 56
- Views: 48452
Re: Composers vs Editors: A Helpful Addition?
E. Gould gives a very strange definition of a tuplet that is to me almost incomprehensible and seemingly incorrect: "A tuplet is a rhythmic division that does not divide unto standard groups of two or three." Even if John's minor typo (it should be 'into' not 'unto') is corrected, when ta...
- 27 Jan 2016, 16:27
- Forum: Engraving Commentaries
- Topic: Xenakis
- Replies: 77
- Views: 76701
Re: Xenakis
I see that one of these pieces, Mists, was written for Roger Woodward. I met him in the late 1960s or early 1970s. He seemed more than intense, but was clearly brilliant both pianistically and musically.
- 25 Jan 2016, 23:11
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: Modern French ties?
- Replies: 15
- Views: 18552
Re: Modern French ties?
Thank you!OCTO wrote:David, beautiful score.
- 25 Jan 2016, 08:07
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: Modern French ties?
- Replies: 15
- Views: 18552
Re: Modern French ties?
I used to use them, as in the scanned manuscript score of mine from the mid-1970s, but not now. I don't recall why I stopped using them – they're in a manuscript of mine from 1989, but not in one from 1994.
- 20 Jan 2016, 09:44
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: Engravers vs Composers: Stem Direction 2
- Replies: 22
- Views: 26331
Re: Engravers vs Composers: Stem Direction 2
… … Perhaps. Also, keep in mind that I'm no pianist. My distinct impression is that Piano has a much freer tradition with regard to engraving conventions than other instruments. This is important to remember when attaching significance to such conventions, which, in essence, are designed to work fo...
- 17 Jan 2016, 15:47
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: Engravers vs Composers: Stem Direction 2
- Replies: 22
- Views: 26331
Re: Engravers vs Composers: Stem Direction 2
While querying neither John's musical nor his pianistic analysis, I'm potentially doubtful of his analysis of Beethoven's writing motivation regarding stem directions, S-shaped slurs and one or two other things; although none of us can be certain of what was going on in his mind or indeed in the ref...
- 23 Dec 2015, 14:24
- Forum: Engraving Commentaries
- Topic: Crumb's unique rhythms
- Replies: 20
- Views: 26610
Re: Crumb's unique rhythms
… … … What do you think, David? I think that there are probably musical situations and types of ensemble in which a standardized 'whole bar note' might work very efficiently, irrespective of the varying time signatures; but for the most part, and after further thought, I agree that it's likely to b...
- 22 Dec 2015, 22:26
- Forum: Engraving Commentaries
- Topic: Crumb's unique rhythms
- Replies: 20
- Views: 26610
Re: Crumb's unique rhythms
A breve (ie double whole note) is perhaps the most traditional-seeming answer that ought to fit most situations, if not as elegant as Crumb's before & after (or multiple) dots.John Ruggero wrote:Or make it a double whole note. Will anyone complain?
- 22 Dec 2015, 19:59
- Forum: Engraving Commentaries
- Topic: Strange notation in Ravel
- Replies: 33
- Views: 41019
Re: Strange notation in Ravel
I'm not trying to answer on behalf of John, but, yes, it is very quick & easy to move noteheads horizontally, independently of the stem, with the Notehead Position Tool in Finale.MJCube wrote:… … … Is there a tool for this in Finale?
- 22 Dec 2015, 19:09
- Forum: Engraving Commentaries
- Topic: Crumb's unique rhythms
- Replies: 20
- Views: 26610
Re: Crumb's unique rhythms
That might work for pianists, but what about some notation that would be clear in single line orchestral parts as “a new kind of note …” as you suggested above?