Search found 25 matches
- 15 Dec 2019, 21:47
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: Timpani. Ma secco, per favore.
- Replies: 7
- Views: 7155
Re: Timpani Secco, per favore.
Okay. How is it done, then?
- 15 Dec 2019, 18:31
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: Timpani. Ma secco, per favore.
- Replies: 7
- Views: 7155
Timpani. Ma secco, per favore.
Hi Forum,
Can somebody tell me, is the plus sign "+" the right way to indicate secco for the Timp. player?
Thanks.
Can somebody tell me, is the plus sign "+" the right way to indicate secco for the Timp. player?
Thanks.
- 12 Dec 2019, 00:04
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: Trombone Partial/Position Indication
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3612
Re: Trombone Partial/Position Indication
Are you referring to the sharp positions, such as :s 2 or officially more idiomatically :s II to play the G above middle C as an alternative to playing it in IV or even in VI? It's seldom necessary to mark these positions, but if there is a G you quite specifically want played in a sharp second pos...
- 11 Dec 2019, 23:57
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: Harp 'quickly mute' indication
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6866
Re: Harp 'quickly mute' indication
I've just spoken to a harp player. She said that in an example such as the one given the player would normally damp at the rests anyway, unless there was insufficient time to do so, in which case there would be no point asking for it. Gould has various things to say about this on pages 364 & 36...
- 11 Dec 2019, 19:04
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: Trombone Partial/Position Indication
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3612
Trombone Partial/Position Indication
Hi Forum, No doubt any professional trombonist knows exactly on what partial/position to play a certain note for best legato connections. For recording sessions that live by the budget, though, time/money can be saved when things can be clarified fully in advance. This in mind, could somebody show m...
- 24 Oct 2019, 15:20
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: Harp 'quickly mute' indication
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6866
Re: Harp 'quickly mute' indication
Perfect, thanks for the input everyone.
- 23 Oct 2019, 21:15
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: Harp 'quickly mute' indication
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6866
Harp 'quickly mute' indication
Hi forum,
What's the standard notation to indicate for the harp to:
- not arpeggiate chord
- mute notes after duration of note
I'm pretty sure my screenshot is not the best idea.
Thanks
What's the standard notation to indicate for the harp to:
- not arpeggiate chord
- mute notes after duration of note
I'm pretty sure my screenshot is not the best idea.
Thanks
- 15 Oct 2019, 17:33
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: Brahms' Più Andante
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3977
Re: Brahms' Più Andante
Awesome, thanks for sharing.
- 08 Oct 2019, 22:13
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: Brahms' Più Andante
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3977
Brahms' Più Andante
Hi Forum,
Quick question on this:
More Andante: did Brahms mean 'slower than' or 'faster than' Andante?
Thanks,
Best
Quick question on this:
More Andante: did Brahms mean 'slower than' or 'faster than' Andante?
Thanks,
Best
- 04 Oct 2019, 16:53
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: A very dotted note (Notational curiosity vol2.)
- Replies: 8
- Views: 5830