Search found 2462 matches
- 02 May 2018, 10:59
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: "Library" vs "Performance" editions
- Replies: 9
- Views: 10381
Re: "Library" vs "Performance" editions
The difference is more apparent the further back in time you go...'. As you imply, the difference between the two has become less now, with the "Urtext" editions being a kind of hybrid of the two. Perhaps the essential difference between the older type of performing edition and a current ...
- 02 May 2018, 10:42
- Forum: News - Questions - Suggestions
- Topic: Notat.io database
- Replies: 5
- Views: 15849
Re: Notat.io database
Absolutely!
- 29 Apr 2018, 12:07
- Forum: Books and Sites
- Topic: The Critical Editing of Music : History, Method, and Practice
- Replies: 31
- Views: 45053
Re: The Critical Editing of Music : History, Method, and Practice
Thanks, OCTO. That saved me from ordering the Williams, which is not my cup of tea. I think I'll wait for a report on the Kelly, Mark, I am concerned that it might be more of a coffee table book and not deal in enough detail with areas that interest me.
- 28 Apr 2018, 16:10
- Forum: Books and Sites
- Topic: The Critical Editing of Music : History, Method, and Practice
- Replies: 31
- Views: 45053
Re: The Critical Editing of Music : History, Method, and Practice
Thanks for bringing this up, Mark. I will order the Williams, as well. I suspect, though, that it doesn't have the kind of detail that would be most interesting: who first started doing this or that and when.
- 28 Apr 2018, 15:54
- Forum: Engraving Commentaries
- Topic: Other comments on notation
- Replies: 5
- Views: 11538
Re: Other comments on notation
I have a inactive Facebook account and was tempted to activate it to view the site, needing a lot of comic relief right now.
- 27 Apr 2018, 11:37
- Forum: Books and Sites
- Topic: The Critical Editing of Music : History, Method, and Practice
- Replies: 31
- Views: 45053
Re: The Critical Editing of Music : History, Method, and Practice
I have often wished for such a book, MarkSealey. Please post if you find one.
- 21 Apr 2018, 20:22
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: When should interpretation should become?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 13292
Re: When should interpretation should become?
I think that your concern about version 2 was justified. Students tend to exaggerate the shortness of shortened notes.
- 19 Apr 2018, 23:03
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: When should interpretation should become?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 13292
Re: When should interpretation should become?
Sorry, Schonbergian, I don't quite get the second part of your post, since I don't think I ever referred to either eight note, just the dotted eighth and sixteenth. But if you think that the first eighth note of the pair in the first measure should also be marked staccato, that is certainly possible...
- 19 Apr 2018, 15:00
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: When should interpretation should become?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 13292
Re: When should interpretation should become?
I don't see exactly why the dotted 8 would be performed shorter, since there is no indication for that. We've had discussions about "unmarked" articulation being shorter in the past here - but that was always in the context of a pre-Romantic piece, generally. I have always understood the ...
- 15 Apr 2018, 19:28
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: When should interpretation should become?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 13292
Re: When should interpretation should become?
You are very welcome, gogreen. I agree completely; clean and uncomplicated is always best.