Inconsistent beaming in Bruckner

Discuss the rules of notation, standard notation practices, efficient notation practices and graphic design.
Post Reply
Schonbergian
Posts: 149
Joined: 03 Feb 2017, 02:25
Location: Toronto

Inconsistent beaming in Bruckner

Post by Schonbergian » 02 Aug 2018, 18:05

While perusing a critical edition of Bruckner's Psalm 150, I noticed that several figures in a solo soprano line are beamed in the modern fashion, i.e. with two groups of four eighth notes in 4/4. This is preserving the notation from the manuscript, in fact:
bruckner_1.PNG
bruckner_1.PNG (147.26 KiB) Viewed 219 times
However, after a few bars, he goes back to the style of beaming he uses throughout the rest of the piece:
bruckner_2.PNG
bruckner_2.PNG (356.49 KiB) Viewed 219 times
Bruckner was usually extraordinarily meticulous with his scores, so I've been looking for some justification for this, but I haven't been able to find one yet. The phrasing seems identical between the "irregularly" beamed section and a similar passage a few measures later (not in either image) that is beamed as per the era.

Anyone have any ideas what this could be representing?

User avatar
John Ruggero
Posts: 1257
Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 14:25
Location: Raleigh, NC USA

Re: Inconsistent beaming in Bruckner

Post by John Ruggero » 03 Aug 2018, 14:50

Judging from the many corrections in the MS in the soprano solo section, some pasted on, it appears that the section was highly modified later. This might have distracted Bruckner and caused the errors.
Mac mini (OS 10.8.5) with dual monitors, Kurzweil Mark 5 with M-Audio Midisport 2 x 2,
Finale 2014d with GPO 4, JW Plug-ins, SmartScore X Pro, Adobe InDesign CS4,
Inkscape .48.5 and .91, FontForge 20150526
http://www.cantilenapress.com

Post Reply