Extreme dynamics
-
- Posts: 96
- Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 16:12
- Contact:
Re: Extreme dynamics
This is off topic, I know, but maybe a good moment to ask John this question that has been puzzling me for some time.
You abbreviate forte and piano dynamics in capital letters (F, P, mF, mP and so on). Why is that? We do not normally write them out as mezzoForte or mezzoPiano, or else capitalize forte or piano, do we? Also, the traditional dynamic glyphs used for and are clearly intended to be small (minuscule) letters, not capitals.
I know that some 19th-century publishers did abbreviate dynamics in capital letters (often all capitals, such as MF). But it would seem odd to me to be following such an obsolete practice.
You abbreviate forte and piano dynamics in capital letters (F, P, mF, mP and so on). Why is that? We do not normally write them out as mezzoForte or mezzoPiano, or else capitalize forte or piano, do we? Also, the traditional dynamic glyphs used for and are clearly intended to be small (minuscule) letters, not capitals.
I know that some 19th-century publishers did abbreviate dynamics in capital letters (often all capitals, such as MF). But it would seem odd to me to be following such an obsolete practice.
- John Ruggero
- Posts: 2471
- Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 14:25
- Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Re: Extreme dynamics
erelievonon wrote:
Nothing intentional, I assure you. Just my way of dealing with the problem of notating musical symbols in these posts. It is more trouble than I want to expend to embolden and italicize small letters to make them sufficiently significant to look like a music font, and since it seems to get the point across, and I didn't think that anyone really cared about it, that is what I do.
I guess my bad reputation precedes me....it would seem odd to me to be following such an obsolete practice...
Nothing intentional, I assure you. Just my way of dealing with the problem of notating musical symbols in these posts. It is more trouble than I want to expend to embolden and italicize small letters to make them sufficiently significant to look like a music font, and since it seems to get the point across, and I didn't think that anyone really cared about it, that is what I do.
M1 Mac mini (OS 12.4), Dorico, Finale 25.5, GPO 4, Affinity Publisher 2, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard maestro
http://www.cantilenapress.com
http://www.cantilenapress.com
-
- Posts: 192
- Joined: 19 Jan 2016, 17:30
Re: Extreme dynamics
To be fair, I believe it is a bit much, precisely because of references already made.
But the serious consideration I have is that any amount of relative dynamics beyond the typical pppp and ffff begs a serious logical question:
Disclaimer: I happen to be one of those people that believes that mf/mp where never designed to be used on a scale, but rather as transitional dynamics between p and f.
I can't create a beautiful post with aligned symbols, so I've replaced them with text instead.
But the serious consideration I have is that any amount of relative dynamics beyond the typical pppp and ffff begs a serious logical question:
- What is the point of dynamics anyway, if it were so pernicious to challenge the convention of their relativity?
Disclaimer: I happen to be one of those people that believes that mf/mp where never designed to be used on a scale, but rather as transitional dynamics between p and f.
I can't create a beautiful post with aligned symbols, so I've replaced them with text instead.
LilyPond Lover
Composer and Transcriber
Teacher and Performer
Composer and Transcriber
Teacher and Performer
Re: RE: Re: Extreme dynamics
You have forgotten 'mezzo niente' and 'poco tutta forza'John Ruggero wrote:più F or più forte is the standard way to express a dynamic between F and FF.
niente — PPPP — PPP — PP — più P — P — meno P — mP — mF — meno F — F — più F — FF — FFF — FFFF — tutta forza = 16 standard dynamic levels
supplemented by sotto voce, mezza voce and rinforzando
"Es ist genug"???
Freelance Composer. Self-Publisher.
Finale 27.5 • Sibelius 2024.3• MuseScore 4+ • Logic Pro X+ • Ableton Live 11+ • Digital Performer 11 /// MacOS Monterey (secondary in use systems: Fedora 35, Windows 10)
Finale 27.5 • Sibelius 2024.3• MuseScore 4+ • Logic Pro X+ • Ableton Live 11+ • Digital Performer 11 /// MacOS Monterey (secondary in use systems: Fedora 35, Windows 10)
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: 07 Oct 2015, 17:22
Re: Extreme dynamics
Also "poco f" "molto f" and "ben f" are sometimes used...
- John Ruggero
- Posts: 2471
- Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 14:25
- Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Re: Extreme dynamics
OCTO. wrote:
Callasmaniac wrote:
Hmmmm…. and "molto tutta forza"? R. Schumann tempo marking: "As fast as possible!" Then later: "Faster!"mezzo niente' and 'poco tutta forza
Callasmaniac wrote:
I was trying to list the most common ones, and only recall poco F used with any frequency. Maybe poco F is better than meno F for the list? poco F is less situational."poco f" "molto f" and "ben f"
M1 Mac mini (OS 12.4), Dorico, Finale 25.5, GPO 4, Affinity Publisher 2, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard maestro
http://www.cantilenapress.com
http://www.cantilenapress.com
Re: Extreme dynamics
At Eastman I was taught that poco f means not “a little bit loud” but actually “not so loud.”
It’s like the difference between “a little” and “little” in English.
It’s like the difference between “a little” and “little” in English.
- John Ruggero
- Posts: 2471
- Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 14:25
- Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Re: Extreme dynamics
MJCube, I believe that your teacher at Eastman was correct. poco f = not quite as loud as f = probably something between mf and f, if one interprets mf to have quite a different feel than f.
I have always assumed that mf is the neutral dynamic; just the simple healthy projected sound that one makes on an instrument. It is the dynamic that the Classical composers expected when they placed no initial dynamic marking in a piece.
I think of meno f as a situational dynamic, i.e. play a little softer than you were. So poco f would seem to be a better choice in the dynamic scheme above than meno f
Well, erelievonon, I bit the bullet and wrestled with the interface to create those dynamics, but couldn't put additional line space after them. Maybe there is a blank character to use? But I think I have a distaste for all the code in the body of the post so I really can't see what I am writing, and that is another reason that I use my makeshift system. I may investigate MJCube's system next time. It does look a lot nicer, but the effort involved does not quite meet my work/reward test.
I have always assumed that mf is the neutral dynamic; just the simple healthy projected sound that one makes on an instrument. It is the dynamic that the Classical composers expected when they placed no initial dynamic marking in a piece.
I think of meno f as a situational dynamic, i.e. play a little softer than you were. So poco f would seem to be a better choice in the dynamic scheme above than meno f
Well, erelievonon, I bit the bullet and wrestled with the interface to create those dynamics, but couldn't put additional line space after them. Maybe there is a blank character to use? But I think I have a distaste for all the code in the body of the post so I really can't see what I am writing, and that is another reason that I use my makeshift system. I may investigate MJCube's system next time. It does look a lot nicer, but the effort involved does not quite meet my work/reward test.
Last edited by John Ruggero on 12 Mar 2016, 14:16, edited 1 time in total.
M1 Mac mini (OS 12.4), Dorico, Finale 25.5, GPO 4, Affinity Publisher 2, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard maestro
http://www.cantilenapress.com
http://www.cantilenapress.com
-
- Posts: 192
- Joined: 19 Jan 2016, 17:30
Re: Extreme dynamics
John Ruggero wrote:MJCube, I believe that your teacher at Eastman was correct. poco f = not quite as loud as f = probably something between mf and f, if one interprets mf to have quite a different feel than f.
I have always assumed that mf is the neutral dynamic; just the simple healthy projected sound that one makes on an instrument. It is the dynamic that the Classical composers expected when they placed no initial dynamic marking in a piece.
I think of meno f as a situational dynamic, i.e. play a little softer than you were. So poco f would seem to be a better choice in the dynamic scheme above than meno f
Well, erelievonon, I bit the bullet and wrestled with the interface to create those dynamics, but couldn't put additional line space after them. Maybe there is a blank character to use? But I think I have a distaste for all the code in the body of the post so I really can't see what I am writing, and that is another reason that I use my makeshift system. I may investigate MJCube's system next time. It does look a lot nicer, but the effort involved does not quite meet my work/reward test.
Not true. Not until Bartok did anyone see this happen.It is the dynamic that the Classical composers expected when they placed no initial dynamic marking in a piece.
LilyPond Lover
Composer and Transcriber
Teacher and Performer
Composer and Transcriber
Teacher and Performer
- John Ruggero
- Posts: 2471
- Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 14:25
- Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Re: Extreme dynamics
John Ruggero wrote
Is it about Classical composers omitting initial dynamic markings? if so, check any authentic edition of the Haydn Piano Sonatas;
Or that this situation should be interpreted as mF? Some might argue F instead of mF and show cases where F is a better choice. I think it varies with the character of the music. Sometimes a later repetition of the same material clarifies the intended dynamic.
I am intrigued about Bartok. Omitting markings is not something I associate with Bartok. Where does Bartok omit initial dynamics other than in a a few educational pieces like the first few in Microcosmos?
DatOrganistTho wrote:It is the dynamic that the Classical composers expected when they placed no initial dynamic marking in a piece.
Sorry, I don't quite understand your objection. I hope I am applying to the right comment in my post.Not true. Not until Bartok did anyone see this happen.
Is it about Classical composers omitting initial dynamic markings? if so, check any authentic edition of the Haydn Piano Sonatas;
Or that this situation should be interpreted as mF? Some might argue F instead of mF and show cases where F is a better choice. I think it varies with the character of the music. Sometimes a later repetition of the same material clarifies the intended dynamic.
I am intrigued about Bartok. Omitting markings is not something I associate with Bartok. Where does Bartok omit initial dynamics other than in a a few educational pieces like the first few in Microcosmos?
M1 Mac mini (OS 12.4), Dorico, Finale 25.5, GPO 4, Affinity Publisher 2, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard maestro
http://www.cantilenapress.com
http://www.cantilenapress.com