Schumann's use of <> on a chord for piano?

Discuss the rules of notation, standard notation practices, efficient notation practices and graphic design.
User avatar
David Ward
Posts: 526
Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 19:50
Location: Aberdeenshire, Scotland
Contact:

Schumann's use of <> on a chord for piano?

Post by David Ward »

What does Schumann mean to indicate by the double hairpin on the long chord before the double bar? In 4/4 marked Langsam, mit innigem Ausdruck

(One sees this sort of thing in some piano reductions, as an indication of what the orchestra might be doing, but this is written for piano and voice from the beginning.)
Attachments
FrauenLiebe.jpeg
FrauenLiebe.jpeg (138.83 KiB) Viewed 11969 times
Finale 25.5 & F 26.3.1
Mac OS 10.13.6 & 10.14.6
https://composers-uk.com/davidward/news-links/
User avatar
Alexander Ploetz
Posts: 22
Joined: 08 Oct 2015, 01:55
Location: Dresden, Germany
Contact:

Re: Schumann's use of <> on a chord for piano?

Post by Alexander Ploetz »

I think that is the Ausdruck.
User avatar
tisimst
Posts: 416
Joined: 08 Oct 2015, 17:57
Location: UT, USA
Contact:

Re: Schumann's use of <> on a chord for piano?

Post by tisimst »

You mean, your piano can't do that? That's too bad ;-)
Music Typeface Designer & Engraver - LilyPond | Sibelius | Finale | MuseScore | Dorico | SMuFL | Inkscape | FontForge
User avatar
John Ruggero
Posts: 2453
Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 14:25
Location: Raleigh, NC USA

Re: Schumann's use of <> on a chord for piano?

Post by John Ruggero »

Pianists are magicians who can suggest impossible things with very limited means. An analogy might be to compare piano music to a master drawing, and orchestral music to an oil painting. And sometimes the drawing is better than the painting, as in a recent Gaspard orchestral episode on this forum.
M1 Mac mini (OS 12.4), Dorico, Finale 25.5, GPO 4, Affinity Publisher 2, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard maestro

http://www.cantilenapress.com
User avatar
John Ruggero
Posts: 2453
Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 14:25
Location: Raleigh, NC USA

Re: Schumann's use of <> on a chord for piano?

Post by John Ruggero »

David, you send me off on interesting tangents. Here is a much more difficult place by Beethoven (Sonata op. 81a). I wanted to post the first edition, but the first edition omits the cresc., which is quite clear in the composer's MS. I guess the original editor couldn't believe his own eyes.
Beethoven cresc.jpg
Beethoven cresc.jpg (366.57 KiB) Viewed 11943 times
A good pianist can create the effect of a cresc. in this held note by:

1. by adding a riten. for this one measure, thus prolonging the agony

2. playing the Bb octave louder than an expected resolution of a C octave appoggiatura and probably louder than the C octave itself

3. by playing the two previous C-Bb's in time and with quite soft resolutions to set up the surprise of 1. and 2.

These three suggestions are notated by Heinrich Schenker in his own personal copy of his own edition of the piano sonatas.

additionally:

4. playing the C octave with plenty of sustaining tone (thus the addition of the octaves at this point)

5. an arclike counterclockwise movement of the whole arm (the upper half of a circle) between the two octaves will create an audible unbroken unity between them and also help the audience feel the effect visually.

The absence of a slur between the two octaves is interesting. It says: this is an anti-appoggiatura-resolution and I, Beethoven, don't want a slur here to convey a normal interpretation with a soft resolution. However, the cresc. and the situation is enough to mean a legato between the two octaves.
M1 Mac mini (OS 12.4), Dorico, Finale 25.5, GPO 4, Affinity Publisher 2, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard maestro

http://www.cantilenapress.com
DatOrganistTho
Posts: 192
Joined: 19 Jan 2016, 17:30

Re: Schumann's use of <> on a chord for piano?

Post by DatOrganistTho »

David Ward wrote:What does Schumann mean to indicate by the double hairpin on the long chord before the double bar? In 4/4 marked Langsam, mit innigem Ausdruck

(One sees this sort of thing in some piano reductions, as an indication of what the orchestra might be doing, but this is written for piano and voice from the beginning.)
Schumann heard his compositions as orchestrations. So yes, even though he heard it doing that, you are asked to do the impossible as a pianist (or so it seems).
LilyPond Lover
Composer and Transcriber
Teacher and Performer
User avatar
OCTO
Posts: 1742
Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 06:52
Location: Sweden

Re: Schumann's use of <> on a chord for piano?

Post by OCTO »

I think it is a theatric dynamics, the pianist should look like he/she is doing crescendo. :grin: :lol: :grin:
Freelance Composer. Self-Publisher.
Finale 27.3 • Sibelius 2023.5• MuseScore 4+ • Logic Pro X+ • Ableton Live 11+ • Digital Performer 10+ /// MacOS Monterey (secondary in use systems: Fedora 35, Windows 10)
MJCube
Posts: 130
Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 13:32
Location: NYC

Re: Schumann's use of <> on a chord for piano?

Post by MJCube »

Re Schumann: < > is sometimes called a “long accent”, i.e. a slower and gentler attack with the same force in context as a regular (sharper) accent. I think this particular case can actually be executed on piano because the chord is preceded by a 16th-note repetition. The expression of the marking extends out a bit farther than the marking itself.

Re Beethoven: While I agree fully with Schenker’s subtleties of execution, I don’t read this as a literal crescendo on a single note. It’s not that subtle: It’s simply that the ending is loud again, and the RH B-flat is much increased on the way to a true forte in the next bar. If one were to orchestrate this, the C whole note would surely be played by few instruments, which could cresc. somewhat, but then more would come in on the B-flat, already forte, and then tutti for the last two chords. This gentle-surprise effect — a jolly rather than cruel surprise, tricking the listener but not assaulting you by going forte all at once — can be gotten on piano with the markings Beethoven wrote.
User avatar
John Ruggero
Posts: 2453
Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 14:25
Location: Raleigh, NC USA

Re: Schumann's use of <> on a chord for piano?

Post by John Ruggero »

In the case of the Schumann, a slightly delayed playing of the chord would substitute for the easing into the chord and rise in dynamic level that a string player might use, and the natural decay of the piano sound would produce the dim.

MJCube, I guess we are very close in our understanding of the passage with a few differences. I do hear an intense cresc. on the C because the C-Bb (and Cb-Bb) has been an important motive and programatic element. But I agree that the cresc. leads on to the forte and unites the C-Bb with the D-Eb as a melody. However, I do not hear a real forte on the Bb, but only the final two chords as marked. For this reason, I would not orchestrate the Bb as you suggest.

Edit— and apparently the original editor did not consider this to be a normal cresc. and for that reason omitted it as a Beethoven eccentricity.
M1 Mac mini (OS 12.4), Dorico, Finale 25.5, GPO 4, Affinity Publisher 2, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard maestro

http://www.cantilenapress.com
User avatar
David Ward
Posts: 526
Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 19:50
Location: Aberdeenshire, Scotland
Contact:

Re: Schumann's use of <> on a chord for piano?

Post by David Ward »

Reviving an old thread; but this excerpt from the conversations with Rohan de Saram by Joachim Steinheuer has something relevant to add on the subject of the <> piano chords in Schumann et al.

BTW, this book is absolutely fascinating for anyone interested in the wide-ranging lifetime experiences of an outstanding, but personally unassuming musician born in 1939. I recommend it (it should be available from Amazon).

(I am currently working on a new piece for Rohan, due for performance in November.)
Attachments
IMG_0177.jpg
IMG_0177.jpg (307.49 KiB) Viewed 11095 times
IMG_0178.jpg
IMG_0178.jpg (194.38 KiB) Viewed 11095 times
Finale 25.5 & F 26.3.1
Mac OS 10.13.6 & 10.14.6
https://composers-uk.com/davidward/news-links/
Post Reply