Tuplet values

Discuss the rules of notation, standard notation practices, efficient notation practices and graphic design.
Post Reply
benwiggy
Posts: 852
Joined: 11 Apr 2016, 19:42

Tuplet values

Post by benwiggy »

We're in 9/8. This bar has 8 demisemiquavers (32nds?) in the time of 12; but the tuplet is marked "3".
Screenshot.png
Screenshot.png (54.9 KiB) Viewed 90737 times
Surely it should be 2, or 4, or 8...?
.
Screenshot.png
Screenshot.png (31.57 KiB) Viewed 90737 times
RMK
Posts: 125
Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 12:12

Re: Tuplet values

Post by RMK »

8 or 8:12 or 8:3 :3
benwiggy
Posts: 852
Joined: 11 Apr 2016, 19:42

Re: Tuplet values

Post by benwiggy »

Perhaps the 3 was a misreading of a badly drawn 8 in the manuscript....?
Anders Hedelin
Posts: 276
Joined: 16 Aug 2017, 16:36
Location: Sweden

Re: Tuplet values

Post by Anders Hedelin »

Doesn't it look more like a badly placed 2? (Left bottom "corner".)
Badly placed or perhaps a little too small.
Finale 26, 27 on Windows 10
benwiggy
Posts: 852
Joined: 11 Apr 2016, 19:42

Re: Tuplet values

Post by benwiggy »

You could be right; the quality of both original the print and the scan make it hard to determine. But when I zoom in, it could be a 2 after all.

Ah yes, there are other instances of the same pattern where it's clearly a 2. Stand down.
Anders Hedelin
Posts: 276
Joined: 16 Aug 2017, 16:36
Location: Sweden

Re: Tuplet values

Post by Anders Hedelin »

Another question about your first example. Now and then I get older manuscripts to work with, where composers obviously use slurs instead of brackets for tuplets, in the old way. Sometimes they are broken, sometimes not. When not, the slurs are not always that obvious: are they just "tuplet slurs", or legato slurs as well?

Any ideas about this?

Edit: Quite possibly this has been discussed before. But in which thread?
Finale 26, 27 on Windows 10
User avatar
OCTO
Posts: 1757
Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 06:52
Location: Sweden

Re: Tuplet values

Post by OCTO »

Anders Hedelin wrote: 01 Dec 2023, 09:25 Doesn't it look more like a badly placed 2? (Left bottom "corner".)
Badly placed or perhaps a little too small.
I would agree. Seems to be "2".
Freelance Composer. Self-Publisher.
Finale 27.5 • Sibelius 2024.3• MuseScore 4+ • Logic Pro X+ • Ableton Live 11+ • Digital Performer 11 /// MacOS Monterey (secondary in use systems: Fedora 35, Windows 10)
User avatar
John Ruggero
Posts: 2464
Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 14:25
Location: Raleigh, NC USA

Re: Tuplet values

Post by John Ruggero »

Pretty sure they are 2s.

To me, tuplet brackets look out of place in older music, being too angular. I'd engrave it as it stands. And then there is the ambiguity:
Anders Hedelin wrote: 01 Dec 2023, 12:25 Another question about your first example. Now and then I get older manuscripts to work with, where composers obviously use slurs instead of brackets for tuplets, in the old way. Sometimes they are broken, sometimes not. When not, the slurs are not always that obvious: are they just "tuplet slurs", or legato slurs as well?

Any ideas about this?
The slur often did double duty as a bracket and a slur. Context often makes clear what was intended. In other cases, we'll never know for sure, so I think it is better to leave it as it is.
M1 Mac mini (OS 12.4), Dorico, Finale 25.5, GPO 4, Affinity Publisher 2, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard maestro

http://www.cantilenapress.com
NeeraWM
Posts: 192
Joined: 30 Nov 2021, 12:11

Re: Tuplet values

Post by NeeraWM »

John Ruggero wrote: 02 Dec 2023, 02:59 The slur often did double duty as a bracket and a slur. Context often makes clear what was intended. In other cases, we'll never know for sure, so I think it is better to leave it as it is.
Sadly not all softwares allow for creation of slur-like tuplet brackets.
Post Reply