Page 3 of 3

Re: Enharmonic symbol

Posted: 19 Jan 2024, 14:10
by John Ruggero
:)

Re: Enharmonic symbol

Posted: 20 Jan 2024, 18:31
by benwiggy
I've decided to add a cautionary accidental to the first note, which should be sufficient help, without muddying the waters too much.
Screenshot.png
Screenshot.png (12.03 KiB) Viewed 3383 times

Re: Enharmonic symbol

Posted: 21 Jan 2024, 20:51
by David Ward
benwiggy wrote: 20 Jan 2024, 18:31 I've decided to add a cautionary accidental to the first note, which should be sufficient help, without muddying the waters too much.
I added a cautionary reminder of the E flat in the key signature after an F sharp (Soprano voice bar 191 - crotchet = 54). Most of the preceding eight minutes or so of this piece is without key signature (as is more usual for me), so I don't think this was superfluous or over-fussy (does anybody disagree?). Either way, when it was performed in November, it excited no comment from the three performers (who were outstanding - the T was a Bar because of the rest of the programme, but that worked excellently).

Re: Enharmonic symbol

Posted: 22 Jan 2024, 18:57
by John Ruggero
I think that the cautionary accidental was completely appropriate because of the previous E naturals in the piano part.

Re: Enharmonic symbol

Posted: 22 Jan 2024, 19:30
by Anders Hedelin
benwiggy wrote: 20 Jan 2024, 18:31 I've decided to add a cautionary accidental to the first note, which should be sufficient help, without muddying the waters too much.
The placement of the cautionary accidental after the "problematic" note (in David's example F#) seems more logical than before it. The second alternative is a little like stating the obvious: Yes, we are in Db! (Five flats, you know.)

Re: Enharmonic symbol

Posted: 23 Jan 2024, 03:40
by John Ruggero
I also thought that the "preemptive" parentheses were a little strange, Anders. But whatever works...

There is yet another possibility that I hesitated to mention because of the apparent complexity of the enharmonics in the work in question and the fear that the tie might be misinterpreted as a slur. But I have seen this (to me) elegant solution in the classical canon:
tied enharmonic.png
tied enharmonic.png (16.43 KiB) Viewed 3298 times

Re: Enharmonic symbol

Posted: 23 Jan 2024, 21:23
by Anders Hedelin
Having browsed through the thread, I find that one solution is missing. The simplest, and least harmful IMO.
Enharmonics.JPG
Enharmonics.JPG (6.72 KiB) Viewed 3264 times
The equal sign has been suggested already, and really says it all. The parenthesis is important, I think, to show that it's just a reminder, not a new information.

Re: Enharmonic symbol

Posted: 23 Jan 2024, 23:21
by OCTO
JJP wrote: 19 Jan 2024, 05:49
John Ruggero wrote: 18 Jan 2024, 13:15 From the music engravers' Hippocratic oath: "First, do no harm."
I thought it was “do no enharm.”
King! I nearly fell off my chair laughing...

Re: Enharmonic symbol

Posted: 28 Mar 2024, 11:14
by benwiggy
Anders Hedelin wrote: 23 Jan 2024, 21:23 The equal sign has been suggested already, and really says it all. The parenthesis is important, I think, to show that it's just a reminder, not a new information.
Interestingly, I've just found an equals sign in parentheses (well, several of them!) in an OUP score.
Screenshot 2.png
Screenshot 2.png (18.29 KiB) Viewed 2937 times