Search found 54 matches
- 26 Jul 2022, 15:08
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: più and meno as dynamic modifers
- Replies: 10
- Views: 540
Re: più and meno as dynamic modifers
[…] meno mp seems counter-intuitive and open to rehearsal questions. So you probably don’t want to say “less quiet” but “louder”. The simplest solution IMO would be “mf”, but if you want to stay relative, you had to say “più :forte” It's a lullaby, so I don't want to go mad. Any thoughts? How about...
- 06 Apr 2022, 12:03
- Forum: Engraving Commentaries
- Topic: First post: Feedback on a score (typesetting, fonts, cover, etc)
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1004
Re: First post: Feedback on a score (typesetting, fonts, cover, etc)
I’m not a typesetting/engraving expert but here are some details that I think could improve legibility: 1st movement • Stem directions m. 5–11, 18–20, 31–44 (and many other), left hand: I’d prefer downward stems for the quarter notes, upward for the shorter ones; this is some kind of polyphony with ...
- 07 Feb 2022, 14:22
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: Proofreading suggestions
- Replies: 23
- Views: 5355
Re: Proofreading suggestions
Not only Peters makes such mistakes but also Hansen with Poulenc’s “Sex tour”: https://www.sheetmusicplus.com/title/se ... c/16656583
- 16 Dec 2021, 07:46
- Forum: Problems and Solutions (Help)
- Topic: a violin open string/specified tring question
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1759
Re: a violin open string/specified tring question
I find the mixture of string number (II) and finger number (0) confusing, so how about two string numbers instead? Also, these numbers don’t have to be that cramped I think. And maybe you could make the crossing clearer by using different stem directions?
- 08 Dec 2021, 18:26
- Forum: Engraving Commentaries
- Topic: Notating a bar
- Replies: 17
- Views: 3350
Re: Notating a bar
Maybe it’s not 100% clear for everyone but I think that like for fingerings in most cases the distribution of notes onto the hands should be decided by the pianist or the editor, not by the composer. In simple cases like this one, there is a “default” distribution every skilled pianist will use with...
- 08 Dec 2021, 17:10
- Forum: Engraving Commentaries
- Topic: Notating a bar
- Replies: 17
- Views: 3350
Re: Notating a bar
IMHO you need those hooks for hand distribution, the stem directions and beaming are clear enough.
- 02 Dec 2021, 07:24
- Forum: Problems and Solutions (Help)
- Topic: How to beam this?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1372
Re: How to beam this?
How about this?
Edit: Added two more options but I think I like the tremolo_beaming.png the most, the position of beats is clearer for me.
Edit: Added two more options but I think I like the tremolo_beaming.png the most, the position of beats is clearer for me.
- 15 Nov 2021, 17:03
- Forum: Problems and Solutions (Help)
- Topic: cross staff or not?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1581
Re: cross staff or not?
IMHO D is horrible, as a pianist I wouldn’t think of two separate rhythms in two separate hands here. I’m not sure whether to prefer A or C, maybe kneed beams are more legible?
How about one of these? I included the variant “B without redundant rests” mentioned by Schonbergian.
How about one of these? I included the variant “B without redundant rests” mentioned by Schonbergian.
- 18 Jul 2020, 08:44
- Forum: Digital Notation Tools
- Topic: Old notation software
- Replies: 16
- Views: 8681
Re: Old notation software
I know that! Train for “transport”, speeding quaver for “fast note entry” etc. :D
However Finale Allegro 98 had less colorful icons …
However Finale Allegro 98 had less colorful icons …
- 18 Jul 2020, 07:07
- Forum: Digital Notation Tools
- Topic: Old notation software
- Replies: 16
- Views: 8681
Re: Old notation software
Does anyone still use MusiXTeX? I didn’t think so until I realized that the documentation (http://icking-music-archive.org/softwar ... sixdoc.pdf) was updated in January …