my assumption as well, David.
fingers crossed that it is officially correct.
I haven't found a reference for it yet, but will keep searching.
Search found 263 matches
- 19 Apr 2023, 21:20
- Forum: Problems and Solutions (Help)
- Topic: harp gliss notation question
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7550
- 19 Apr 2023, 20:44
- Forum: Problems and Solutions (Help)
- Topic: Notation question from Fauré Élégie
- Replies: 8
- Views: 10808
Re: Notation question from Fauré Élégie
aha, the edition I'm using is an old Schirmer edition, edited by Alwin Schroeder.
Seems to be an edition from 1914.
Seems to be an edition from 1914.
- 19 Apr 2023, 14:41
- Forum: Problems and Solutions (Help)
- Topic: Notation question from Fauré Élégie
- Replies: 8
- Views: 10808
Re: Notation question from Fauré Élégie
John, no, actually. My edition has all the busy work remaining in the lower staff in that section. It's actually in the 3rd and 4th measures of the 2nd theme (when it switches to major... the conflicts are at measure 25-30), the down-stem right hand melody, the beams are all smooshed into the spaces...
- 19 Apr 2023, 14:28
- Forum: Problems and Solutions (Help)
- Topic: harp gliss notation question
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7550
harp gliss notation question
I can't seem to find the answer to this in Gould's book, so... I notate a harp glissando. Starting note... then 6 grace-note sized notes to show the required string tunings. That's all fine. It's even fine when the glissando is, for example, two hands in3rds, or 5ths... The problem arises when in oc...
- 19 Apr 2023, 11:33
- Forum: Problems and Solutions (Help)
- Topic: Notation question from Fauré Élégie
- Replies: 8
- Views: 10808
Re: Notation question from Fauré Élégie
there're a few spots in the sheet music where beams get messed up in the staff lines, and I keep reading the notes wrong because of this. it's very frustrating because the music itself is NOT difficult to play, but some of the easier passages are just frustrating to read because of this type of issu...
- 19 Apr 2023, 02:11
- Forum: Problems and Solutions (Help)
- Topic: Notation question from Fauré Élégie
- Replies: 8
- Views: 10808
Re: Notation question from Fauré Élégie
Thank-you John. Now that cannabis is legal almost everywhere I NEVER take the musical literacy nor the musicians' states of mind during rehearsals as a given. So I tend to over-write in my scores. After a disastrous reading of a band work where the percussionists came in :forte mid-way through a lov...
- 18 Apr 2023, 19:08
- Forum: Problems and Solutions (Help)
- Topic: Notation question from Fauré Élégie
- Replies: 8
- Views: 10808
Notation question from Fauré Élégie
At the bottom of this page, the piano right hand does something, but there is no rhythmic marking to clarify it. I'm presuming that the right hand is playing 32nd note triplets (first note of each missing)? Isn't it odd that an edition from this time period would omit a detail of that sort? I might ...
- 09 Apr 2023, 04:39
- Forum: Engraving Commentaries
- Topic: O/T bariolage question
- Replies: 25
- Views: 30755
Re: O/T bariolage question
thank-you John.
by the way, this is actually the first piece I entirely composed with Dorico (instead of Finale).
(to be precise, I use pencil and paper as well as the software.)
by the way, this is actually the first piece I entirely composed with Dorico (instead of Finale).
(to be precise, I use pencil and paper as well as the software.)
- 08 Apr 2023, 17:24
- Forum: Engraving Commentaries
- Topic: O/T bariolage question
- Replies: 25
- Views: 30755
Re: O/T bariolage question
this week I had a rehearsal with the violist who is supposed to premiere the concerto, and she played the bariolage passage beautifully.
its not a fast passage, nor particular virtuosic, but it was beautifully expressive.
its not a fast passage, nor particular virtuosic, but it was beautifully expressive.
- 07 Apr 2023, 17:05
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: A note in Rachmaninoff
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3304
Re: A note in Rachmaninoff
sounds like an F# to me.
structurally, it looks logical to have an F# there as well considering the subsequent measure.
structurally, it looks logical to have an F# there as well considering the subsequent measure.