This is what I came up with as a resolution.
Do you guys see this as acceptable?
Search found 261 matches
- 31 Aug 2023, 21:56
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: unison wih different value noteheads, question
- Replies: 26
- Views: 148411
- 31 Aug 2023, 13:45
- Forum: Digital Notation Tools
- Topic: Dorico development issue
- Replies: 31
- Views: 62557
Re: Dorico development issue
the thing is, when Gould says for example that you shouldn't use a bracket for certain instrument groups in an orchestra score, and that the first 10 scores from different publishers I pull out of my library all contradict what she is saying, then there is at least some support for ignoring Gould an...
- 30 Aug 2023, 20:22
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: unison wih different value noteheads, question
- Replies: 26
- Views: 148411
Re: unison wih different value noteheads, question
how do we feel about parentheses? should I use them in this context? or just the accidental? annoyingly, I've made a playback technique for the accidental, and removing the parentheses respaces things so that the little sharp symbol ends up immediately next to the :piano dynamic. So I get :piano :s ...
- 30 Aug 2023, 19:24
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: unison wih different value noteheads, question
- Replies: 26
- Views: 148411
Re: unison wih different value noteheads, question
I think in this case it would be a small articulation-like accidental, under the staff (since it's the down-stem voice that could cause an issue), at the stem end or below the notehead.
I'll look and see what the end result gives.
I'll look and see what the end result gives.
- 30 Aug 2023, 16:00
- Forum: Digital Notation Tools
- Topic: Dorico development issue
- Replies: 31
- Views: 62557
Re: Dorico development issue
The thing that "worries" me a bit about Dorico's development team, is how often I read responses on their forums that basically say "this is what Gould says is the correct way to do it."
- 29 Aug 2023, 16:46
- Forum: Digital Notation Tools
- Topic: Dorico development issue
- Replies: 31
- Views: 62557
Dorico development issue
purely an opinion, and one based on a relatively more limited knowledge of the material at hand than most people on this forum here, but.. I think that the Dorico development team's over-reliance on Gould's "Behind bars" is an error. So far, while I find much of Behind Bars' material to be...
- 28 Aug 2023, 23:43
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: unison wih different value noteheads, question
- Replies: 26
- Views: 148411
Re: unison wih different value noteheads, question
considering a C natural would REALLY not fit the harmony at that point, I'm going to cross my fingers and hope it's self-explanatory. a few measures earlier there's an almost identical passage, but with B natural (with no displayed accidental) instead of C#, so it would be natural to assume that the...
- 28 Aug 2023, 22:45
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: unison wih different value noteheads, question
- Replies: 26
- Views: 148411
Re: unison wih different value noteheads, question
so the fact that there is no natural sign implies that the quarter note C is also sharp?
thank-you.
this will look much neater in the score/part.
thank-you.
this will look much neater in the score/part.
- 28 Aug 2023, 21:29
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: DaFalla piece
- Replies: 6
- Views: 9638
Re: DaFalla piece
I'm imagining that it was placed above as a way of avoiding the extra space it would cause before the note, considering there is that curved bracket between the low C and the E.
- 28 Aug 2023, 20:46
- Forum: Notation Rules and Standards
- Topic: DaFalla piece
- Replies: 6
- Views: 9638
Re: DaFalla piece
there is a courtesy accidental.. above the E.