Simple 4/4 grouping poll

Discuss the rules of notation, standard notation practices, efficient notation practices and graphic design.
User avatar
Fred G. Unn
Posts: 435
Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 13:24
Location: NYCish

Simple 4/4 grouping poll

Post by Fred G. Unn »

Hi all,

In the simple 4/4 bars below, which bars show your preferred method of note grouping? I've honestly had different clients/editors/supervisors request all 3 before. Assume this is for a solo instrument at a moderate tempo, although if either of those would have an effect on your choice, I'd be curious to hear why. If it makes a difference to you whether the eighth note is on the beat, or is an upbeat, there are two options. Does it make any difference if the eighth note is an eighth rest? I've heard justifications for all 3 options, but am curious what the current trends and preferences are.

Image

A, B, or C?
benwiggy
Posts: 834
Joined: 11 Apr 2016, 19:42

Re: Simple 4/4 grouping poll

Post by benwiggy »

As a professional sightreader ... A is clearest. 3 beats, then worry about subdividing.

I think I'd prefer A for Number 2 too. I'd definitely want 2A if the first note was a rest.

B might give clarity depending on the texture in the other parts. If something is happening on the half-bar in the music. But I wouldn't want 2B if there was a rest to start.

There's something about a bigger note starting on the off-beat (2B and 2C) that I find a bit confusing. It might be just me, though. ;) I suspect they're everywhere in jazz!

A dotted minim is one of the exceptions (in my book) to the sacred half-bar. The other is something like this:
Screenshot.png
Screenshot.png (16.59 KiB) Viewed 2931 times
if the bar's not too complicated. It's a very common rhythm in Early music.
User avatar
Fred G. Unn
Posts: 435
Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 13:24
Location: NYCish

Re: Simple 4/4 grouping poll

Post by Fred G. Unn »

benwiggy wrote: 10 Apr 2022, 17:41 The other is something like this:
... It's a very common rhythm in Early music.
Ooof, it might be common in early music, but I don't think I can get on board with that one. I would always do that one like this in 4/4 unless there was a specific reason not to (like really 2+3+3):
Image

(I do like your flag though, which I know you designed.)

Anyone else care to weigh in on A, B, or C?
User avatar
David Ward
Posts: 526
Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 19:50
Location: Aberdeenshire, Scotland
Contact:

Re: Simple 4/4 grouping poll

Post by David Ward »

FWIW I've often written C and no performer has ever made comment of which I've been aware (for or against). Depending on what's going on in the other parts I might also write either A or B.

I think all three are acceptable, depending on context.

I think Ben's cross-beat notation is quite common not only in early music, but also in 19th century Italian opera. I suspect it can also be found in Brahms (John?). My feeling is that for dance music and other contexts in which an audible sense of beat is very important it would be unwise, but if one wants a real sense of freedom from beat and rigid tempo, it may have advantages.
Finale 25.5 & F 26.3.1
Mac OS 10.13.6 & 10.14.6
https://composers-uk.com/davidward/news-links/
User avatar
John Ruggero
Posts: 2453
Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 14:25
Location: Raleigh, NC USA

Re: Simple 4/4 grouping poll

Post by John Ruggero »

Right you are David. Here is the first edition.
Brahms Academic Festival Overture 1.jpeg
Brahms Academic Festival Overture 1.jpeg (45.69 KiB) Viewed 2868 times
Brahms Academic Festival Overture 2.jpeg
Brahms Academic Festival Overture 2.jpeg (38.64 KiB) Viewed 2868 times
Brahms actually preferred to eliminate almost ALL the ties by placing dots after the bar line, as I suspected before I consulted the MS:
Brahms Academic Festival Overture 3.jpeg
Brahms Academic Festival Overture 3.jpeg (76.85 KiB) Viewed 2868 times
Arnstein allowed B only for orchestral parts and would have rewritten the Brahms completely as he did for all composers except a few like Leonard Bernstein who didn't go along with it.
M1 Mac mini (OS 12.4), Dorico, Finale 25.5, GPO 4, Affinity Publisher 2, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard maestro

http://www.cantilenapress.com
User avatar
Fred G. Unn
Posts: 435
Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 13:24
Location: NYCish

Re: Simple 4/4 grouping poll

Post by Fred G. Unn »

David Ward wrote: 11 Apr 2022, 06:54 FWIW I've often written C and no performer has ever made comment of which I've been aware (for or against). Depending on what's going on in the other parts I might also write either A or B.
I think all 3 are fine, I was just curious what the current preferences were. I've had several clients who insisted on C, and it is the house style for all Jazz at Lincoln Center publications including hundreds of Duke Ellington transcriptions.
John Ruggero wrote: 11 Apr 2022, 12:18 Arnstein allowed B only
That's helpful, thanks! Did he allow the eighth, quarter, quarter, quarter, eighth syncopation in the first two bars of your top example? That's typically an "allowable" exception, although I find myself becoming less comfortable with it.
User avatar
John Ruggero
Posts: 2453
Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 14:25
Location: Raleigh, NC USA

Re: Simple 4/4 grouping poll

Post by John Ruggero »

He would have broken up the middle quarter note into a pair of tied eighth notes to show the third beat. He allowed only quarter-half-quarter. eighth-quarter-eighth, sixteenth-eighth-sixteenth etc. and broke everything else to clarify the beats and division of the beats.

All done to make the parts "foolproof", both for the players and the various copyists who he couldn't always supervise.

Personally, I the prefer Brahms approach.
Last edited by John Ruggero on 21 Apr 2022, 11:28, edited 1 time in total.
M1 Mac mini (OS 12.4), Dorico, Finale 25.5, GPO 4, Affinity Publisher 2, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard maestro

http://www.cantilenapress.com
hautbois baryton
Posts: 76
Joined: 06 Jan 2018, 17:06

Re: Simple 4/4 grouping poll

Post by hautbois baryton »

A or B, never C.
Composer and engraver
ttw
Posts: 12
Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 11:55

Re: Simple 4/4 grouping poll

Post by ttw »

Just to add an amateur opinion (though I've read lots of tangos on todotango.com to get an idea of how 4-beat 2/4 looks; the newer composers use 4/4.

I find all about the same when sight-reading. (Though this can become sigh-treading at times.) It's more important to be consistent throughout a piece.

All the todotango.com and free Latin fake books are very academic; they follow Stone or Read pretty closely.
User avatar
David Ward
Posts: 526
Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 19:50
Location: Aberdeenshire, Scotland
Contact:

Re: Simple 4/4 grouping poll

Post by David Ward »

This is Mahler (retained in the published score). See violins 1 bars 3 and 4.
Attachments
Screenshot 2022-04-19 at 09.13.22.png
Screenshot 2022-04-19 at 09.13.22.png (638.79 KiB) Viewed 2604 times
Finale 25.5 & F 26.3.1
Mac OS 10.13.6 & 10.14.6
https://composers-uk.com/davidward/news-links/
Post Reply