The State of the Art, circa 1991

Recommendations concerning notation and publishing software in a non-partisan environment.
Post Reply
User avatar
Fred G. Unn
Posts: 435
Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 13:24
Location: NYCish

The State of the Art, circa 1991

Post by Fred G. Unn »

Went down a bit of a rabbit hole today and stumbled on a review summarizing the state of music notation software 30 years ago. For anyone with a JSTOR account the review is simply titled "Music Notation Software" and is by Karl Signell, published in the Journal of the American Musicological Society, Vol. 44, No. 1 (Spring, 1991), pp. 136-148.

The review covers The Copyist III, Finale, MusicPrinter Plus, Music Writer, Personal Composer, SCORE, Theme, NoteWriter, and Professional Composer. Anyway, here are a few pages for anyone interested. I found it amusing that SCORE 3.0, the same version many people are still using today, he labels as "unfriendly interface" in 1991, LOL!

Image

Image

Image
User avatar
John Ruggero
Posts: 2453
Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 14:25
Location: Raleigh, NC USA

Re: The State of the Art, circa 1991

Post by John Ruggero »

I remember reading this article or perhaps an early review of Finale when I first became interesting in notation software. The writer thought that the automatic spacing concept was a big mistake, probably for the reason given on the first page above.
M1 Mac mini (OS 12.4), Dorico, Finale 25.5, GPO 4, Affinity Publisher 2, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard maestro

http://www.cantilenapress.com
User avatar
Fred G. Unn
Posts: 435
Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 13:24
Location: NYCish

Re: The State of the Art, circa 1991

Post by Fred G. Unn »

The inflation rate between 1991 and today has been almost 95% (in USD) so that $749 Finale price tag would be in $1,459 today's dollars. Gulp! I think I remember it being $600 when I bought it in 1993 or 1994, but I was in school so it was half off. Not a lot of info out there but looks like Encore was released in 1992, so missed this review. I might be wrong, but I don't think the Acorn version of Sibelius was publicly available yet, certainly not in the US anyway.
RMK
Posts: 123
Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 12:12

Re: The State of the Art, circa 1991

Post by RMK »

Finale was $1,000 when I purchased my copy (late 80's?). I had a 3-digit serial number!

I also paid $2,500 for a Mac Plus (no hard drive, 1MB of memory) and $5,000 for an Apple laser printer (300 dpi, letter or legal size paper only).
User avatar
OCTO
Posts: 1742
Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 06:52
Location: Sweden

Re: The State of the Art, circa 1991

Post by OCTO »

What a wonderful history. I have heard about Finale in 1997, then a student, and a friend told me that it can enter grace notes. I remember how happy I was.
Freelance Composer. Self-Publisher.
Finale 27.3 • Sibelius 2023.5• MuseScore 4+ • Logic Pro X+ • Ableton Live 11+ • Digital Performer 10+ /// MacOS Monterey (secondary in use systems: Fedora 35, Windows 10)
Anders Hedelin
Posts: 272
Joined: 16 Aug 2017, 16:36
Location: Sweden

Re: The State of the Art, circa 1991

Post by Anders Hedelin »

The first time I worked with Finale was in the middle of the 90's, on a Mac Classic (?), the small cube with computer and screen all in one. I recall when making a change to the music, even the smallest one like dotting a note, the screen had to redraw itself - and it took about 10 seconds each time. I had all the time in the world at the time, so that was no problem. I was simply thrilled by having access to this brave new technology.
Finale 26, 27 on Windows 10
benwiggy
Posts: 835
Joined: 11 Apr 2016, 19:42

Re: The State of the Art, circa 1991

Post by benwiggy »

Me too! I was commissioned to typeset a new composition for a Cathedral choir in 1994. The choir school had a little Mac SE (with the 9-inch 512 by 342 pixel screen!) and a copy of MusicProse 2.1, which was a cut-down version of Finale. Of course, the manual was missing, and there was no internet Help, so I had to discover everything (It took me several years to work out why I could enter nothing but rests in Speedy Entry).

My work was awful, it has to be said. But I was fascinated by the process (however laborious) and what you could produce. I used a new document whenever a new page called for a different number of staves, because I didn't know how to do staff hiding (and I hadn't looked ahead when I started).
Anders Hedelin
Posts: 272
Joined: 16 Aug 2017, 16:36
Location: Sweden

Re: The State of the Art, circa 1991

Post by Anders Hedelin »

I also recall my first impression of Finale when I had a glimpse of what a colleague of mine was working with. I thought "this is just SO primitive". Much later I understood he must have been in Scroll View.
Finale 26, 27 on Windows 10
Post Reply