Durand's 'highlights'

Have your scores reviewed by other users. Comment on old and new published scores and on publishers.
Post Reply
User avatar
OCTO
Posts: 1838
Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 06:52
Location: Sweden
Contact:
Contact OCTO

Durand's 'highlights'

Post by OCTO »

One of numerous clef misses.
d30c4a685b6a52fb687e4c314767add1.jpg
d30c4a685b6a52fb687e4c314767add1.jpg (39.67 KiB) Viewed 9352 times

Finale 27.5 • Sibelius 2024.3• MuseScore 4+ • Logic Pro X+ • Ableton Live 12+ • Digital Performer 11 /// MacOS Monterey (secondary in use systems: Fedora 35, Windows 10)
Top
John Ruggero
Posts: 2711
Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 14:25
Location: Raleigh, NC USA

Re: Durand's 'highlights'

Post by John Ruggero »

A subject that hasn't yet come up at Notatio is proofreading practice. I have always noticed differences in accuracy between the different publishers, which doesn't always correlate with their excellence otherwise. For example, the older G. Schirmer and Henle publications are remarkably accurate, whereas, Durand and Wiener Urtext less so.
M1 Mac mini (OS 12.4), Dorico 6, Finale 25.5, GPO 4, Affinity Publisher 2, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard maestro
Top
User avatar
OCTO
Posts: 1838
Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 06:52
Location: Sweden
Contact:
Contact OCTO

Re: Durand's 'highlights'

Post by OCTO »

I find the Russian edition Muzgiz also very accurate, ...but not so beautiful.

Finale 27.5 • Sibelius 2024.3• MuseScore 4+ • Logic Pro X+ • Ableton Live 12+ • Digital Performer 11 /// MacOS Monterey (secondary in use systems: Fedora 35, Windows 10)
Top
John Ruggero
Posts: 2711
Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 14:25
Location: Raleigh, NC USA

Re: Durand's 'highlights'

Post by John Ruggero »

So, I would be very interested to know how Notatio members handle proofreading and will start another thread on the topic.
M1 Mac mini (OS 12.4), Dorico 6, Finale 25.5, GPO 4, Affinity Publisher 2, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard maestro
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Engraving Commentaries”