Page 2 of 2

Re: Trying to find a balance in staff sizes

Posted: 16 Dec 2021, 20:52
by OCTO
I use 6.8mm as a standard for all parts and NE size (240*320mm).
It is a plenty of space, and not difficult to read.

Re: Trying to find a balance in staff sizes

Posted: 16 Dec 2021, 21:59
by NeeraWM
OCTO wrote: 16 Dec 2021, 20:52 I use 6.8mm as a standard for all parts and NE size (240*320mm).
It is a plenty of space, and not difficult to read.
My ignorance: what is NE size? I mean, is it the shortening of something?

Re: Trying to find a balance in staff sizes

Posted: 18 Dec 2021, 17:24
by OCTO
NeeraWM wrote: 16 Dec 2021, 21:59
OCTO wrote: 16 Dec 2021, 20:52 I use 6.8mm as a standard for all parts and NE size (240*320mm).
It is a plenty of space, and not difficult to read.
My ignorance: what is NE size? I mean, is it the shortening of something?
New Edition, as promoted by Schott.

Re: Trying to find a balance in staff sizes

Posted: 18 Dec 2021, 18:32
by NeeraWM
OCTO wrote: 18 Dec 2021, 17:24 New Edition, as promoted by Schott.
Never heard of it!
Is some kind of Wiener Urtext collaboration between Universal Edition & I think Schott or ... what else?