Page 3 of 3
Re: unison wih different value noteheads, question
Posted: 02 Sep 2023, 13:54
by hautbois baryton
Anders Hedelin wrote: ↑02 Sep 2023, 06:31
...I've found that exaggerated clarity can be as disturbing as a lack of it.
Absolutely, it is a fine line.
Re: unison wih different value noteheads, question
Posted: 11 Dec 2023, 19:42
by hautbois baryton
I have a related issue.
The current version of the second staff shows where I moved the downstem note away from the upstem's dot so as not to collide.

- unison1.jpg (36.53 KiB) Viewed 64631 times
The old version shows where I moved the downstem in front of the upstem's notehead.

- unison2.jpg (29.04 KiB) Viewed 64631 times
I'm not happy with either; any suggestions?
Re: unison wih different value noteheads, question
Posted: 11 Dec 2023, 19:48
by NeeraWM
If one has to be chosen, it would be the "unison1" version for me.
Condensing-wise, you could have Horns I-II-IV together and III alone.
Re: unison wih different value noteheads, question
Posted: 11 Dec 2023, 20:28
by Anders Hedelin
NeeraWM wrote: ↑11 Dec 2023, 19:48
Condensing-wise, you could have Horns I-II-IV together and III alone.
Better to expand the usual I-II, III-IV pattern into I-II, III, IV on three staves, than to introduce a new pattern of I-II-IV, III.
Re: unison wih different value noteheads, question
Posted: 11 Dec 2023, 20:44
by NeeraWM
Fair enough!
Re: unison wih different value noteheads, question
Posted: 14 Dec 2023, 19:04
by OCTO
hautbois baryton wrote: ↑11 Dec 2023, 19:42
I'm not happy with either; any suggestions?
To my eye, the second example was immediately easy to understand.
Re: unison wih different value noteheads, question
Posted: 15 Dec 2023, 04:34
by Shinianqi
Deleted