Page 1 of 1

boxed/unboxed instrument name changes on staff

Posted: 03 Dec 2024, 19:47
by MichelRE
The question is should I use a rectangular frame for instrument name changes (for example to note when a clarinetist changes to a bass clarinet, or flute changes to piccolo)?

if so, should it be
(unboxed) "to piccolo" ________________________ (boxed) "[piccolo]"
or
(boxed) "[to piccolo]" _____________________________ (unboxed) "piccolo"

or should both be boxed?

I know it's a rather nit-picky question.

The reason I ask is that if I box the "to" instrument change, then when the new instrument arrives it can rely solely on the instrument name appearing at the head of that system/line.

If I box the arrival of the new instrument, then I redundantly have both the instrument name at the head of that staff, AND as a text item just before the first notes of the new instrument.

Re: boxed/unboxed instrument name changes on staff

Posted: 04 Dec 2024, 09:54
by Callasmaniac
My system: at the change bold and underlined below the staff - FL. 2 muta in PICCOLO. At the entrance of new instrument bold boxed above the staff - PICCOLO.

Re: boxed/unboxed instrument name changes on staff

Posted: 19 Feb 2025, 23:01
by hautbois baryton
I have the "to piccolo" in bold font, and "piccolo" in bold font and boxed.
instrumentchangetext.jpg
instrumentchangetext.jpg (102.02 KiB) Viewed 59952 times

Re: boxed/unboxed instrument name changes on staff

Posted: 25 Feb 2025, 21:46
by NeeraWM
I prefer change announcement "prendre Flute alto" in regular (but bold is also fine if this is your house style), then boxed when the actual entrance takes place. As you did.