Slurs Ugly or necessary?

Discuss the rules of notation, standard notation practices, efficient notation practices and graphic design.
Post Reply
DePaule
Posts: 12
Joined: 30 Apr 2022, 17:44

Slurs Ugly or necessary?

Post by DePaule »

Is there any rule for this?
For me without slurs it looks better. Thank you for any Input!
2023-02-10 22_41_53-Freue dich Welt.png (PNG-Grafik, 1562 × 2048 Pixel) - Skaliert (46%) – Mozilla F.png
2023-02-10 22_41_53-Freue dich Welt.png (PNG-Grafik, 1562 × 2048 Pixel) - Skaliert (46%) – Mozilla F.png (214.62 KiB) Viewed 7979 times
2023-02-10 22_41_58-~_Downloads_285.ly [geändert] – Frescobaldi.png
2023-02-10 22_41_58-~_Downloads_285.ly [geändert] – Frescobaldi.png (21.52 KiB) Viewed 7979 times
User avatar
tisimst
Posts: 416
Joined: 08 Oct 2015, 17:57
Location: UT, USA
Contact:

Re: Slurs Ugly or necessary?

Post by tisimst »

Scores with this format (i.e., hymnnals) do tend to bend the rules a bit on this, but for a couple of useful reasons. Most folks who sing these are not professionals and need less busy notation. Also, but kind of the same reason, since music like this is also what is used for the accompaniment, the bottom is much too complicated for the everyday pianist/organist, at least in my church.

I would rather do the top for note clarity, but add a single slur where the lyrics suggest it, like in the bottom example, and only split voices where there are different rhythms, otherwise combine into a chord. Are most people used to your top example? I believe so. Is it wrong? Well, depends on who you ask. Those are my thoughts.
Music Typeface Designer & Engraver - LilyPond | Sibelius | Finale | MuseScore | Dorico | SMuFL | Inkscape | FontForge
Schonbergian
Posts: 252
Joined: 03 Feb 2017, 02:25
Location: Toronto

Re: Slurs Ugly or necessary?

Post by Schonbergian »

I prefer the voices to be split in hymns, as is done in all the highest-quality English hymnals. It makes reading the independent progression of each part much easier as a singer.
DePaule
Posts: 12
Joined: 30 Apr 2022, 17:44

Re: Slurs Ugly or necessary?

Post by DePaule »

Thank you for your Input, SATB in 2 Lines is static for me now.
What is more readable? I'm split. Because the upper example requires also the concentration to make the bindings through the text and beams. So I would prefer the slurs. But for the first sight, the upper is more clean.
User avatar
OCTO
Posts: 1742
Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 06:52
Location: Sweden

Re: Slurs Ugly or necessary?

Post by OCTO »

The "slurring" is correct, DePaule, but I am not sure why it is much easier to read the original example above...
Spacing, font sizes, beaming, lines, curves, positions... Sorry for heavy words, but to me it looks that the music will drop out from the page in the second example.
Freelance Composer. Self-Publisher.
Finale 27.3 • Sibelius 2023.5• MuseScore 4+ • Logic Pro X+ • Ableton Live 11+ • Digital Performer 10+ /// MacOS Monterey (secondary in use systems: Fedora 35, Windows 10)
DePaule
Posts: 12
Joined: 30 Apr 2022, 17:44

Re: Slurs Ugly or necessary?

Post by DePaule »

The second example is from lilypond. The first from an old book.
So I have to work on the layout in Lilypond?
benwiggy
Posts: 835
Joined: 11 Apr 2016, 19:42

Re: Slurs Ugly or necessary?

Post by benwiggy »

There are two issues here: the beaming, and the stemming.

The first example beams the notes according to the syllables of the words; the lower example beams to the rhythmic beat. If you beam to the syllables, then you don't need slurs, because the information is already there. However, you lose the rhythmic information.

As a tenor (and former alto), I prefer entirely separate lines (stems) for each part, even when they have the same rhythms. Notice that the upper example has the wrong tenor rhythm in bar 3.

If you look at books of Bach Chorales written for keyboard, they are written out with separate lines; and it make sense to me to match this. (Closed score is mostly to enable piano-playing of the choir's music.)

The second example needs to have lyric extension lines. Both examples need serif fonts!
Screenshot 17.png
Screenshot 17.png (95.67 KiB) Viewed 7755 times
User avatar
John Ruggero
Posts: 2453
Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 14:25
Location: Raleigh, NC USA

Re: Slurs Ugly or necessary?

Post by John Ruggero »

Originally, every voice had its own stem, even in keyboard music. Then, purely as a notational convenience, notes began to be stemmed together if they had the same rhythm. But this makes it harder to see music as independent voices interacting to form harmony, and more as a series of block chords strung together, which has a very negative effect on composing in terms of harmonic and rhythmic variety. Now even choral music, which gave birth to polyphony, is often written as chordal blocks, further reinforcing this viewpoint. This is a great tragedy.
M1 Mac mini (OS 12.4), Dorico, Finale 25.5, GPO 4, Affinity Publisher 2, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard maestro

http://www.cantilenapress.com
JJP
Posts: 74
Joined: 01 Jun 2018, 02:58
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Re: Slurs Ugly or necessary?

Post by JJP »

John Ruggero wrote: 16 Feb 2023, 13:18 Now even choral music, which gave birth to polyphony, is often written as chordal blocks, further reinforcing this viewpoint. This is a great tragedy.
The sentiment behind this statement is beautiful. Bravo!
There is no computer problem so complex that it cannot be solved by a sledge hammer.

Symbols of Sound - music preparation and consulting
Ander
Posts: 10
Joined: 08 Apr 2023, 08:39

Re: Slurs Ugly or necessary?

Post by Ander »

AFAIK, the slurs actually indicate a glide from one note to the next, and are thus a specific part of the performance rather than gratuitous phrasing.

That said, I think longer phrase-oriented slurs are rarely worth the clutter in vocal music; a good director will often provide that sort of guidance with their body language. 😉
Post Reply