Multiple voices, single staff again
Multiple voices, single staff again
Hello again
I'm confused about another multiple voices on one staff situation:
Are there any rules regarding horizontal placement of notes in middle voices? How is this affected by stem direction?
Example below:
measure 35, beat 3 "a" is behind the note column.
In measure 36, beat 1 and beat 3, and measure 37, beat 1, this voice is in front of the note column.
FWIW, Lilypond's default voice order is shown below. Is this the general consensus, if the voices are explicit?
Thanks to all for any advice!
Dirck
.
I'm confused about another multiple voices on one staff situation:
Are there any rules regarding horizontal placement of notes in middle voices? How is this affected by stem direction?
Example below:
measure 35, beat 3 "a" is behind the note column.
In measure 36, beat 1 and beat 3, and measure 37, beat 1, this voice is in front of the note column.
FWIW, Lilypond's default voice order is shown below. Is this the general consensus, if the voices are explicit?
Thanks to all for any advice!
Dirck
.
- Magnus Johansson
- Posts: 269
- Joined: 07 Oct 2025, 10:51
- Location: Sweden
- Contact:
Re: Multiple voices, single staff again
Hello! This is very interesting. From what edition is your music example? Is it for guitar?
Igor Engraver 1.7 via CrossOver on Debian GNU/Linux or Q4OS.
Re: Multiple voices, single staff again
Hello MagnusMagnus Johansson wrote: 31 Mar 2026, 19:40 Hello! This is very interesting. From what edition is your music example? Is it for guitar?
I'm not sure what you mean by "edition"...?
This is a lute piece by Francesco da Milano that I am arranging for guitar. The image is my own engraving using Lilypond.
dirck
Re: Multiple voices, single staff again
I might not have been clear with my original post...sorry!
My biggest question is the position of the.middle voices.
Each individual measure looks good to me, but you can see that the middle voice is not treated consistently from m. 35 to m. 37.
Should these middle voice notes be:
BTW, this will be a performance score, not a "scholarly" edition! (if it were a scholarly edition, i would engrave all the notes on a grand staff)
thanks again! I'm sorry to bother everyone here with questions like these, which are probably basic knowledge for a professional engraver!
Dirck
My biggest question is the position of the.middle voices.
Each individual measure looks good to me, but you can see that the middle voice is not treated consistently from m. 35 to m. 37.
Should these middle voice notes be:
- in front of the note column (as in m.35)?
- behind the note column (m.36)?
- or, lined up with the note column, with a shortened stem? (this could be done with m.36 and 37)
BTW, this will be a performance score, not a "scholarly" edition! (if it were a scholarly edition, i would engrave all the notes on a grand staff)
thanks again! I'm sorry to bother everyone here with questions like these, which are probably basic knowledge for a professional engraver!
Dirck
-
John Ruggero
- Posts: 3055
- Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 14:25
- Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Re: Multiple voices, single staff again
I think that Lilypond is getting this right. However, I didn't understand the diagram at the end of your post.
In situations like the second half of m. 36 and m. 37 it is best to dovetail the middle voice to make a more compact appearance. However, dovetailing is not possible when seconds are involved as in m. 35, and the note is moved to the other side. However, Lilypond seems to be making the first beat of m. 36 an exception to conform with the two following similar situations. Quite sophisticated.
Here is the way Dorico does it by default. I find it less musical.
In situations like the second half of m. 36 and m. 37 it is best to dovetail the middle voice to make a more compact appearance. However, dovetailing is not possible when seconds are involved as in m. 35, and the note is moved to the other side. However, Lilypond seems to be making the first beat of m. 36 an exception to conform with the two following similar situations. Quite sophisticated.
Here is the way Dorico does it by default. I find it less musical.
M1 Mac mini (OS 12.4), Dorico 6, Finale 25.5, GPO 4, Affinity Publisher 2, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard maestro
Re: Multiple voices, single staff again
addendum: I understand that guitar music is a niche, and not often covered in style manuals, but if anyone can point me to a manual with good coverage regarding guitar idiosyncracies, I'd be grateful!
Special problems regarding guitar that I run into fairly often:
There is a lot of poorly engraved guitar music out there! I'm trying to make my stuff a little better!
thanks again!
dirck
Special problems regarding guitar that I run into fairly often:
- 3 and 4 voices per staff
- simultaneous unisons on different strings
- harmonics notation
- scordatura notation
There is a lot of poorly engraved guitar music out there! I'm trying to make my stuff a little better!
thanks again!
dirck
Re: Multiple voices, single staff again
Thank you John!John Ruggero wrote: 31 Mar 2026, 20:23 I think that Lilypond is getting this right. However, I didn't understand the diagram at the end of your post.
In situations like the second half of m. 36 and m. 37 it is best to dovetail the middle voice to make a more compact appearance. However, dovetailing is not possible when seconds are involved as in m. 35, and the note is moved to the other side. However, Lilypond seems to be making the first beat of m. 36 an exception to conform with the two following similar situations. Quite sophisticated.
Here is the way Dorico does it by default. I find it less musical.
Dorico.png
So on the downbeat of m. 36, should the middle voice "A" be moved to the right side, or is it OK where it is? m.36 and 37 are Lilypond defaults, BTW. I had to adjust m.35 manually.
I don't care for Dorico's default either; i'd rather see the highest and lowest voices aligned vertically wherever possible
-
John Ruggero
- Posts: 3055
- Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 14:25
- Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Re: Multiple voices, single staff again
If you had to adjust m. 35, then perhaps Lilypond is not as sophisticated as I had assumed! No, I would leave it as is. You are doing a good job. And guitar music follows the same conventions as music for any other medium, as far as I know. Any solo string music will have multiple voices on one staff and one will face the same issues.
M1 Mac mini (OS 12.4), Dorico 6, Finale 25.5, GPO 4, Affinity Publisher 2, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard maestro
Re: Multiple voices, single staff again
Thanks John!
- Magnus Johansson
- Posts: 269
- Joined: 07 Oct 2025, 10:51
- Location: Sweden
- Contact:
Re: Multiple voices, single staff again
Then we can perhaps say it is your edition. Attaching my suggestion for the passage in question:dircknagy wrote: 31 Mar 2026, 20:02Hello MagnusMagnus Johansson wrote: 31 Mar 2026, 19:40 Hello! This is very interesting. From what edition is your music example? Is it for guitar?
I'm not sure what you mean by "edition"...?
This is a lute piece by Francesco da Milano that I am arranging for guitar. The image is my own engraving using Lilypond.
dirck
Igor Engraver 1.7 via CrossOver on Debian GNU/Linux or Q4OS.