Here is the last page from a violin sonata.
1. It is extreme dense. The engraver was probably enforced to do this: there is no rest in violin part, and it is very heavy to learn by heart.
2. Despite its density it is perfectly readable. I even enjoyed playing from it. Of course some things are on the edge of legibility.
Any comment?
Dense page
Dense page
- Attachments
-
- 768759675.pdf
- (852.13 KiB) Downloaded 915 times
Freelance Composer. Self-Publisher.
Finale 27.5 • Sibelius 2024.3• MuseScore 4+ • Logic Pro X+ • Ableton Live 11+ • Digital Performer 11 /// MacOS Monterey (secondary in use systems: Fedora 35, Windows 10)
Finale 27.5 • Sibelius 2024.3• MuseScore 4+ • Logic Pro X+ • Ableton Live 11+ • Digital Performer 11 /// MacOS Monterey (secondary in use systems: Fedora 35, Windows 10)
Re: Dense page
It is definitely bigger than A4/Letter, something close to B4. I don't have it now to check.
But I guess that the stave size is between 6.5-7 mm.
But I guess that the stave size is between 6.5-7 mm.
Freelance Composer. Self-Publisher.
Finale 27.5 • Sibelius 2024.3• MuseScore 4+ • Logic Pro X+ • Ableton Live 11+ • Digital Performer 11 /// MacOS Monterey (secondary in use systems: Fedora 35, Windows 10)
Finale 27.5 • Sibelius 2024.3• MuseScore 4+ • Logic Pro X+ • Ableton Live 11+ • Digital Performer 11 /// MacOS Monterey (secondary in use systems: Fedora 35, Windows 10)
-
- Posts: 96
- Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 16:12
- Contact:
Re: Dense page
This page is indeed quite an engraving tour de force.
In spite of the extreme density, there are quite frequent small cues from the piano part - sometimes just one note - on separate, tiny staves.
I am curious, Octo, since you have played this piece, were all those small cues necessary? Were they helpful, worth all the trouble of squeezing them in? Would the violin part have been usable also without them?
In spite of the extreme density, there are quite frequent small cues from the piano part - sometimes just one note - on separate, tiny staves.
I am curious, Octo, since you have played this piece, were all those small cues necessary? Were they helpful, worth all the trouble of squeezing them in? Would the violin part have been usable also without them?
Re: Dense page
This piece is one of the most difficult to play together (I haven't played some Ferneyhough, though!), and I can say, not 100% necessary to have piano there (I guess that was the composer's idea), since it takes so enormous time to set it properly together.erelievonen wrote: were all those small cues necessary? Were they helpful, worth all the trouble of squeezing them in? Would the violin part have been usable also without them?
The last page is here:
https://youtu.be/ROKMp4iemUc?t=23m22s
Interestingly, the second movement starts like this:
https://youtu.be/ROKMp4iemUc?t=8m49s
Anyone wants to guess what is the rhythm that is played by piano?
Freelance Composer. Self-Publisher.
Finale 27.5 • Sibelius 2024.3• MuseScore 4+ • Logic Pro X+ • Ableton Live 11+ • Digital Performer 11 /// MacOS Monterey (secondary in use systems: Fedora 35, Windows 10)
Finale 27.5 • Sibelius 2024.3• MuseScore 4+ • Logic Pro X+ • Ableton Live 11+ • Digital Performer 11 /// MacOS Monterey (secondary in use systems: Fedora 35, Windows 10)
Re: Dense page
I have no idea, but it is indeed a very beautiful piece!OCTO wrote:Anyone wants to guess what is the rhythm that is played by piano?
Re: Dense page
As far as I remember, it is a quintuplet of that starts with :Knut wrote:I have no idea, but it is indeed a very beautiful piece!OCTO wrote:Anyone wants to guess what is the rhythm that is played by piano?
|----5----|
I think that Enesco wanted to create, or better to say, to notate improvisation. Everything is so improvisational, yet very accurate.
Freelance Composer. Self-Publisher.
Finale 27.5 • Sibelius 2024.3• MuseScore 4+ • Logic Pro X+ • Ableton Live 11+ • Digital Performer 11 /// MacOS Monterey (secondary in use systems: Fedora 35, Windows 10)
Finale 27.5 • Sibelius 2024.3• MuseScore 4+ • Logic Pro X+ • Ableton Live 11+ • Digital Performer 11 /// MacOS Monterey (secondary in use systems: Fedora 35, Windows 10)
- John Ruggero
- Posts: 2575
- Joined: 05 Oct 2015, 14:25
- Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Re: Dense page
This one amazing page of music inspires a number of comments:
1. Apropos of another thread, the treble clefs are to me very graceful and generally upright. One sees that, being hand engraving, they are tilted at slightly different angles, as mentioned by Knut. The clefs for the cues are in a somewhat different style and not as nice.
2. The cues seem to be very intelligently done, and the result of experience in playing the piece. This must be the composer's work.
3. I have never seen the large flat-headed comma-like symbols, one of which cuts through an arpeggio symbol and I have no idea what they mean. Some kind of wild gliss.? And the markings bsf and bF etc.?
4. Spacing has forced the accidentals very close to many of the note heads and stems in the 16th passages. With the capabilities of computer engraving, would one now reduce note size for these passages?
5. 4 before 52 This beaming seems counter-intuitive. Is it an attempt to keep the motion going through the rests? In general, the decisions about the "expressive" beaming as at 54 are interesting. When he breaks the secondary beam, he seems to be indicating that the last two 16ths should be felt as pickups.
1. Apropos of another thread, the treble clefs are to me very graceful and generally upright. One sees that, being hand engraving, they are tilted at slightly different angles, as mentioned by Knut. The clefs for the cues are in a somewhat different style and not as nice.
2. The cues seem to be very intelligently done, and the result of experience in playing the piece. This must be the composer's work.
3. I have never seen the large flat-headed comma-like symbols, one of which cuts through an arpeggio symbol and I have no idea what they mean. Some kind of wild gliss.? And the markings bsf and bF etc.?
4. Spacing has forced the accidentals very close to many of the note heads and stems in the 16th passages. With the capabilities of computer engraving, would one now reduce note size for these passages?
5. 4 before 52 This beaming seems counter-intuitive. Is it an attempt to keep the motion going through the rests? In general, the decisions about the "expressive" beaming as at 54 are interesting. When he breaks the secondary beam, he seems to be indicating that the last two 16ths should be felt as pickups.
M1 Mac mini (OS 12.4), Dorico, Finale 25.5, GPO 4, Affinity Publisher 2, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard maestro
http://www.cantilenapress.com
http://www.cantilenapress.com
Re: Dense page
That seems to be pretty unique, I have never seen it in other scores. I played it as an extreme portamento, enforced. You have to play it always using the previous finger.John Ruggero wrote: I have never seen the large flat-headed comma-like symbols, one of which cuts through an arpeggio symbol and I have no idea what they mean. Some kind of wild gliss.?
I think it stands for "ben". Obviously the composer wants that violinist breaks his violin at the last page. :oJohn Ruggero wrote:And the markings bsf and bF etc.?
Agree. It seems to be more a philosophical beaming.John Ruggero wrote:4 before 52 This beaming seems counter-intuitive. Is it an attempt to keep the motion going through the rests?
Freelance Composer. Self-Publisher.
Finale 27.5 • Sibelius 2024.3• MuseScore 4+ • Logic Pro X+ • Ableton Live 11+ • Digital Performer 11 /// MacOS Monterey (secondary in use systems: Fedora 35, Windows 10)
Finale 27.5 • Sibelius 2024.3• MuseScore 4+ • Logic Pro X+ • Ableton Live 11+ • Digital Performer 11 /// MacOS Monterey (secondary in use systems: Fedora 35, Windows 10)
Re: Dense page
I love this violin sonata engraving, it"s pure "Eye Candy". I'd wager that the formatting of this piece took a lot of thought. Well balanced.
MacBook Pro (Retina, 15-inch, Late 2013)
1 TB Flash Processor 2.6 GHz Core i7, 16 GB Ram, 4 TB external HD
Logic Pro X 10.2, Cubase 9
Final 25.2, Sibelius 8.5
UR 44, M1, Keystation 88
Adobe CC
1 TB Flash Processor 2.6 GHz Core i7, 16 GB Ram, 4 TB external HD
Logic Pro X 10.2, Cubase 9
Final 25.2, Sibelius 8.5
UR 44, M1, Keystation 88
Adobe CC